Contractual penalties in international contracts
Contractual penalties in international contracts – is it worth introducing them to the contract?
A B2B agreement in the international trade might be concluded in several ways. Unless the law specifically says that an agreement must be made in a specific form (like getting it signed by a notary or putting it in writing), most often the involved parties can decide about the way of formalizing their agreement.
Although in common understanding, an agreement is concluded only when two parties sign the content of a specific document, it should be remembered that in addition to the traditional written form, agreements can also be concluded:
It is important that the parties reach an understanding concerning all fundamental elements of the agreement such as: who will provide what, to whom, within what period, on what terms and conditions.
It should be noted that concluding an agreement orally does not mean that the deal does not exist. Numerous agreements are concluded this way. What may be problematic in this case is proving what the parties agreed upon. Such a situation may arise when a dispute occurs between the parties.
It’s important to remember that certain actions require a specific form of agreement in order to be valid. For instance, in Poland, transferring copyright requires a written form. If this form isn’t obeyed, the transfer of copyright won’t be legal. It is considered completely invalid in this case.
To put it simply, concluding an agreement assuming the transfer of copyright to a specific subject ] through the exchange of e-mail messages will not result in the transfer of these rights..
Therefore, when choosing a specific form of concluding an agreement, first of all, it is worth determining its subject and whether it is necessary to formalize it in a specific form or not. Failing to meet the requirements of relevant law can lead to significant repercussions.
First of all, we should consider why we are talking about the way and form of concluding agreements at all. In an ideal world, verbal agreements would be efficient to conclude a particular transaction. One person verbally undertakes to perform a certain type of service for an agreed price, which the other party undertakes to pay.
However, in practice, disputes often arise between the parties regarding issues such as:
The above are only examples of potential issues that may arise between the parties. As we can see, there are many of them.
To avoid uncertainty in the above mentioned issues it is worth concluding the precise agreement that will cover what’s necessary for the cooperation to work properly. If we have a written agreement with a foreign business partner that clearly and unambiguously defines what the parties have agreed to and under what conditions, the risk of dispute in the above mentioned cases is appropriately minimized. On the other hand, even if a dispute arises and one of the parties breaches its obligations, the agreement will enable a more efficient enforcement.
The best agreement is therefore that one that firstly, complies with the provisions of applicable law, and, secondly, allows to demonstrate (prove) what the parties have agreed to and under what conditions, as well as what are the consequences of failing to perform the specified obligations. Of course, a written form is very safe in this regard, but often contracts concluded through acceptance of an offer, order, and exchange of email messages between the parties also provide a proof of the essential parties settlements regarding the content of the concluded contract.
There are many ways and forms of concluding contracts with foreign contractors, often depending on the adopted commercial practice of the parties. However, not all of them will properly protect the interests of the entrepreneur from an unfair business partner. When concluding a B2B agreement, it is worth analyzing in detail the risk associated with the lack of documentation of certain activities. What should be also analyzed is whether resigning the conclusion of the agreement in a written form, aimed at making the process of concluding the agreement faster, will not have negative consequences during its implementation. When making or confirming any arrangements with a foreign business partner, it is advisable to use available means of electronic communication. The above will certainly be useful in documenting certain agreements in case of a dispute over the contract’s performance.
Joanna Lubecka
attorney
Contractual penalties in international contracts – is it worth introducing them to the contract?
The common commercial practice is to communicate only in electronic form, through the exchange of e-mails. It should be remembered that in this case a contract is also concluded in the form of a commercial custom adopted by the parties.
Economic cooperation with a foreign contractor can be formalized in several ways. Do you know them? Are any of them better than the others? Let’s see.
In practice, a significant part of the negotiations between the parties is devoted to these provisions.
The international sale of goods is very often associated with the use of Incoterms rules. What are they and why are they so helpful?
Entering into commercial relations with a foreign contractor involves risk. What is the risk in foreign trade and how to increase the security of such transactions? Read more.
Case study
You are engaged in discussions with a potential foreign partner regarding the terms of a possible economic partnership. During the negotiation process, you discover that the partnership is supposed to be governed by a straightforward agreement or purchase order and the standard General Terms and Conditions used by your business partner.
Confidentiality clause is a contractual provision on the basis of which the parties decide to accept that the information specified by them, indicated in the contract, will be confidential, and therefore cannot be freely available to third parties, under the pain of the consequences specified in the contract.
Case study