Contractual penalties in international contracts
Contractual penalties in international contracts – is it worth introducing them to the contract?
Indemnification provisions and hold harmless provisions of B2B contracts in international trade regulate the issues of liability of the parties related to possible damages of the products that may occur on the buyer’s side.
These provisions are referred to as “indemnification provisions” and “hold harmless provisions”.
Let’s see what their role is on the practical example.
Let’s imagine the following situation: a new type of interactive toy for children is about to be introduced to the European market. The manufacturer has subjected the toy to numerous tests and trials, including in terms of its safety. All legal requirements were complied with, before the toy was placed on the market. The sale of the toy on the European market was to be handled by a Polish company owned by Adam. It has obtained an exclusivity clause for distribution.
As a result of errors during the production process, a batch of toys has a significant defect. One of the small elements of the toy can be easily detached and causes a danger to children. Despite the actions aimed at withdrawing the defective batch of the product from the market, damage and harm can still occur.
Firstly, it’s important to assess whether the faulty product qualifies as a hazardous product, meaning it fails to provide the expected level of safety during the regular use. If so, the responsibility of the producer would be involved.
Furthermore, the extent and parties responsible for any damages caused by the defective product largely depend on the specific terms and conditions mentioned in the agreement between the parties involved, including the indemnification provisions. The scope of liability of the manufacturer and Adam will therefore depend on what the parties agreed in the contract.
The purpose of introducing indemnification provisions and hold harmless provisions to the contract is precisely to spread the risk associated with the conclusion of the contract between parties. They may regulate issues such as a commitment by one party to the other to protect it against specific claims by third parties, including those resulting from defects in things and their consequences, such as damage or harm.
For this reason, indemnification provisions are often among the most important points in negotiations between the parties regarding the conclusion of a B2B contract in international trade.
Joanna Lubecka
attorney
Contractual penalties in international contracts – is it worth introducing them to the contract?
The common commercial practice is to communicate only in electronic form, through the exchange of e-mails. It should be remembered that in this case a contract is also concluded in the form of a commercial custom adopted by the parties.
Economic cooperation with a foreign contractor can be formalized in several ways. Do you know them? Are any of them better than the others? Let’s see.
In practice, a significant part of the negotiations between the parties is devoted to these provisions.
The international sale of goods is very often associated with the use of Incoterms rules. What are they and why are they so helpful?
Entering into commercial relations with a foreign contractor involves risk. What is the risk in foreign trade and how to increase the security of such transactions? Read more.
Case study
You are engaged in discussions with a potential foreign partner regarding the terms of a possible economic partnership. During the negotiation process, you discover that the partnership is supposed to be governed by a straightforward agreement or purchase order and the standard General Terms and Conditions used by your business partner.
Confidentiality clause is a contractual provision on the basis of which the parties decide to accept that the information specified by them, indicated in the contract, will be confidential, and therefore cannot be freely available to third parties, under the pain of the consequences specified in the contract.
Case study